Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6090757
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T12:15:02+00:00 2026-05-23T12:15:02+00:00

Let’s say I have a table like this: CREATE TABLE t( [guid] [uniqueidentifier] NOT

  • 0

Let’s say I have a table like this:

CREATE TABLE t(
  [guid] [uniqueidentifier] NOT NULL,
  [category] [nvarchar](400)
  {,...other columns}
  )

Where guid is my primary key, and has a clustered index.

Now, I want an index that covers both category and guid, because I’m rolling up some other stuff related to t by category, and I want to avoid including the t table itself.

Is it sufficient to create index covering category, or do I need to include guid as well?

I would expect SQL Server indexes to point directly to page offsets in t rather than simply referring to a guid primary key value, which means I would need to explicitly include the PK column to avoid hitting t. Is this the case?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T12:15:03+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 12:15 pm

    Actually your assumption is wrong – all SQL Server non-clustered indices do include the clustering key (single or multiple columns) and do not point directly at some physical page.

    This prevents SQL Server from having to reorganize and update lots of index entries when a page needs to be split in two or relocated. So if you are seeking in a non-clustered index and you find a value, then you have the clustering key and SQL Server will need to do a “bookmark lookup” (or key lookup) to retrieve the actual data page (the leaf page in the clustering index) to get the whole set of data belonging to a single row.

    That said – if you ever have a situation where it depends on the ordering of the key columns, then you still might need to create an index specifically on (guid, category) – of course, in that case, SQL Server is smart enough to figure out that the clustering key column is already in the index and won’t be adding it one more time.

    The fact that the clustering key column(s) are inlcuded in every single non-clustered index is another strong reason why your clustering keys should be narrow, static and unique. Making them too wide (anything beyond 8 byte) is a sure recipe for bloat and slow-down.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say I have table with column 'URL' whrere I store urls like this
Let's say I have a text file composed like this ##### typeofthread1 ##### typeofthread2
Let's say that I have a set of relations that looks like this: relations
Let's say that I have classes like this: public class Parent { public int
Let's say I have this MySQL table: OK.. see the type field? Type 0
Let's say I dynamically create a timer like this: System.Timers.Timer expirationTimer = new Timer(expiration
Let's say on a page I have alot of this repeated: <div class=entry> <h4>Magic:</h4>
Let's say I can call a method like this: core::get() . What is the
Let's say I have the following text: (example) <table> <tr> <td> <span>col1</span> </td> <td>col2</td>
Let's say there is a graph and some set of functions like: create-node ::

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.