Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6717943
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T08:54:42+00:00 2026-05-26T08:54:42+00:00

Let’s say I have an abstract base class Base with a virtual function doSomething()

  • 0

Let’s say I have an abstract base class Base with a virtual function doSomething()

There are two derived classes, one of which takes no parameters in doSomething() while the other takes a structure and an integer as a parameter.

A function in another class (SomeClass) calls doSomething() using a Base* variable.
It also needs to pass the parameters i mentioned for DerivedTwo.

How do i choose the prototype without using an if-else to check for the object’s class at run-time?

Thank you.

    class Base {
      public:
      void virtual doSomething(); 
    }

    class DerivedOne : Base {
      public:
      void doSomething(int a,struct b);
    }

    class DerivedTwo : Base {
      public:
      void doSomething();
    }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T08:54:43+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 8:54 am

    One way to do this would be:

    class Base {
    public:
        Base();
        virtual ~Base();
        virtual void doSomething();
    };
    
    class DerivedOne : public Base {
    public:
        DerivedOne();
        void doSomethingElse(int a,struct b);
    };
    
    class DerivedTwo : public Base {
    public:
        DerivedTwo();
        virtual void doSomething();
    };
    

    You could then use dynamic_cast to determine the type at runtime since you seem to have a type-conditional expression someplace in SomeClass. The methods are not equal and fundamentally distinct. Also, DerivedOne::doSomething would hide Base::doSomething.

    Update

    As the others had already stated, it’s often a bad smell if your program relies on type-conditional expressions. Since your example does not have enough context to offer appropriate solutions, it’s hard for us to help you in this regard. If you are interested in removing the type-conditional, one of many potential solutions to this problem would be:

    class Base {
    public:
        Base();
        virtual ~Base();
        virtual void doSomething();
    };
    
    class DerivedOne : public Base {
    public:
        DerivedOne();
        // ...
        virtual void doSomething(); // << no parameters required.
                                    // they have moved to member data:
    private:
        int a;
        b another;
    };
    
    class DerivedTwo : public Base {
    public:
        DerivedTwo();
        virtual void doSomething();
    };
    

    then you could remove the type-conditional expression from your program. If you’d like help in this regard, feel free to ask here or open a new question if you feel it is more appropriate.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let us assume I have two classes: class Base{}; class Derived: public Base{}; none
Let's say you have a class called Customer, which contains the following fields: UserName
Let's say we have a simple function defined in a pseudo language. List<Numbers> SortNumbers(List<Numbers>
Let's say I have this form: class SimpleUploadForm(forms.Form): file = forms.FileField() I have this
Let's say I have a link in a table like: <td class=ms-vb width=100%> <a
Let's say I have a class like this: public class Person { private String
Let's say I have two files.. I want to compare them side-by-side and see
Let's say I have two entities: Physician Credentials And a physician can have many
let's say i have three tables, each one relates to another, when i need
Let say I have two UIViews: View1: - bounds: 0, 0, 20, 20 -

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.