Let’s say I want to create a dynamic library dynamic.so, but my code references a function that exists in some other, static library static.a. Naturally, if I compile and link with g++ and the -sharedoption, dynamic.so will expect the referenced function to be implemented in some other dynamic library that I would have to link at runtime together with dynamic.so. In other words, it will be happy as long as I do -l static (modulo syntax).
But since that other library is actually a static one, I cannot do that. Let’s assume I can not link the static library at compile time of my main program either, but I’m forced to only use dynamic libraries. So what I really want is to include the compiled code off the referenced function from static.a in dynamic.so.
This answer to a related question suggests using the --whole-archive option to include static.a in dynamic.so. However, in my case, static.a is huge. And I really don’t need all of it, I only need that one function definition.
This answer to another question explains that linking to a static library at compile time means that only the code that is actually referenced gets included in the binary. Well, this is exactly what I would like to do for my single function reference! I don’t really want the whole static archive in there.
But how can I achieve that? How can I include just the required parts of static.a in dynamic.so?
You don’t need
--whole-archive: just link yourdynamic.solike this:This will pull into dynamic.so anything the linker needs from
libstatic.a.See this explanation to understand why that is.One problem might be that your
libstatic.ais compiled without-fPIC. On 32-bitx86/Linux, that would still work (though your library will not be saving you much RAM if multiple processes are using it). Onx86_64, linking non-fPIC code into a shared library can’t work, so you’ll have to rebuild it with-fPIC.