Let’s say we want to do some substitutions only between some patterns, let them be <a> and </a> for clarity… (all right, all right, they’re start and end!.. Jeez!)
So I know what to do if start and end always occur on the same line: just design a proper regex.
I also know what to do if they’re guaranteed to be on different lines and I don’t care about anything in the line containing end and I’m also OK with applying all the commands in the line containing start before start: just specify the address range as /start/,/end/.
This, however, doesn’t sound very useful. What if I need to do a smarter job, for instance, introduce changes inside a {...} block?
One thing I can think of is breaking the input on { and } before processing and putting it back together afterwards:
sed 's/{\|}/\n/g' input | sed 'main stuff' | sed ':a $!{N;ba}; s/\n\(}\|{\)\n/\1/g'
Another option is the opposite:
cat input | tr '\n' '#' | sed 'whatever; s/#/\n/g'
Both of these are ugly, mainly because the operations are not confined within a single command. The second one is even worse because one has to use some character or substring as a “newline holder” assuming it isn’t present in the original text.
So the question is: are there better ways or can the above-mentioned ones be optimized? This is quite a regular task from what I read in recent SO questions, so I’d like to choose the best practice once and for all.
P.S. I’m mostly interested in pure sed solutions: can the job be do with one invocation of sed and nothing else? Please no awk, Perl, etc.: this is more of a theoretical question, not a “need the job done asap” one.
This might work for you:
Explanation:
/{/!b;:a;/}/!{$q;N;ba}hs/[^{]*{//;s/}.*//s/this\|that/\U&/gx;Gs/{[^}]*}\([^\n]*\)\n\(.*\)/{\2}\1/EDIT:
A more complicated answer which I think caters for more than one block per line.
N.B. This uses GNU specific options but could be tweaked to work with generic sed’s.