Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 595235
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T16:02:23+00:00 2026-05-13T16:02:23+00:00

Microsoft says fields and properties must differ by more than just case. So, if

  • 0

Microsoft says fields and properties must differ by more than just case. So, if they truly represent the same idea how should they be different?

Here’s Microsoft’s example of what not to do:


using System;
namespace NamingLibrary
{    
    public class Foo    // IdentifiersShouldDifferByMoreThanCase    
    {        
        protected string bar;

        public string Bar        
        {            
            get { return bar; }        
        }    
    }
}

They give no guidance on how this should look. What do most developers do?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T16:02:23+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 4:02 pm

    No, Microsoft says publicly visible members must differ by more than just case:

    This rule fires on publicly visible members only.

    (That includes protected members, as they’re visible to derived classes.)

    So this is fine:

    public class Foo
    {
        private string bar;
        public string Bar { get { return bar; } }
    }
    

    My personal rule is not to allow anything other private fields anyway, at which point it’s not a problem.

    Do you really need protected fields? How about making the property have a protected setter if you want to be able to mutate it from derived classes?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.object.gethashcode(VS.80).aspx says: For the best performance, a hash function must generate a random distribution
One of the things that the Microsoft documentation says about enabling reliable sessions is
Microsoft's new Windows Live Application Based Storage API is a RESTful API. More info
Microsoft SQL Server Profiler is a graphical user interface to SQL Trace for monitoring
Microsoft recently announced that the Javascript/HTML DOM library jQuery will be integrated into the
Microsoft Access is a slick way to access data in a MS SQL Server
Microsoft like implementing their own versions of popular open-source frameworks and assemblies, for example:
Microsoft, of Cairo fame, is working on Oslo, a new modeling platform . Bob
Microsoft seems hell-bent on deprecating the swiss-army-knife of database tools. What else comes close
Microsoft Visual Studio (2005 and 2008) seems to have fun shuffling the Project IDs

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.