Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 505115
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T06:33:56+00:00 2026-05-13T06:33:56+00:00

More sanity checking than an actual question, so this dll is not signed? Does

  • 0

More sanity checking than an actual question, so this dll is not signed? Does anyone know if there is any semi-recent version of this that is signed?
I just find this very strange and i mpretty sure there must be some sort of error on my side
Cheers

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T06:33:56+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 6:33 am

    No, it’s not signed. However if you need it signed (like if you wanted to GAC it or something like that), you can do so yourself with the included source code.

    This is available here: http://compositewpf.codeplex.com/

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is more of a sanity check than anything else. I've found that when
More a question out of curiosity than anything, but why does C# define two
More of a warning than a question: We resolved a very puzzling bug this
This more of a sanity check question, I'm beginning to doubt myself. As I
More specifically, does NDK have a complete STL implementation. We're looking at this for
I am quite unfamiliar with operating on individual bits. This question is more of
More of a sanity check than anything else. Do browsers always use the last
I'm not sure if it's possible , but is there a more concise (or
This is more of a conceptual integrity question for something that's been bothering me.
Other being able to sanity check values in a setter is there a more

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.