Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3850730
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T17:03:17+00:00 2026-05-19T17:03:17+00:00

This is more of a sanity check than anything else. I’ve found that when

  • 0

This is more of a sanity check than anything else. I’ve found that when working with closures in Javascript I often use the following pattern to access the enclosing class from within the function:

MyClass.prototype.delayed_foo = function() {
    var self = this;
    setTimeout(function() {
        self.foo(); // Be nice if I could use 'this' here
    }, 1000);
};

Obviously this works just fine, and it’s not even a big hassle to work with. There’s just this little itch in the back of my brain that says ‘You’re making this too complicated, dummy!’ Is this the commonly accepted pattern?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T17:03:18+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 5:03 pm

    This is the commonly accepted pattern with the exception that that is often used instead of self.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

More sanity checking than an actual question, so this dll is not signed? Does
This more of a sanity check question, I'm beginning to doubt myself. As I
This is more for information then a problem. (On searching Stack Overflow I found
I might be making this more complicated than I have to. I have a
While tuning the application, I found this routine that strips XML string of CDATA
This is one of those problems that drives you on the verge of sanity.
I have a worksheet, in where I need a search that does more than
I am probably making this more complicated than it need be and hope you
This is more of a conceptual integrity question for something that's been bothering me.
This more of a style question, rather than a how to. So I've got

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.