Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6211297
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T06:18:43+00:00 2026-05-24T06:18:43+00:00

Most of the time, when you compile a shared library, executing it is meaningless

  • 0

Most of the time, when you compile a shared library, executing it is meaningless and doing so produces nothing useful:

$ ./libfoobarbaz.so
Segmentation fault

However, the folks at GNU have been able to stick in some output when glibc is executed:

$ /lib/libc.so.6
GNU C Library (Debian EGLIBC 2.11.2-10) stable release version 2.11.2, by Roland McGrath et al.
Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Compiled by GNU CC version 4.4.5.
Compiled on a Linux 2.6.32 system on 2011-01-23.
Available extensions:
    crypt add-on version 2.1 by Michael Glad and others
    GNU Libidn by Simon Josefsson
    Native POSIX Threads Library by Ulrich Drepper et al
    BIND-8.2.3-T5B
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
<http://www.debian.org/Bugs/>.

Although this particular use seems like plain old bloat to me, how did they achieve making a shared library that also acts as a working executable?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T06:18:44+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 6:18 am

    The trick here is, that executables and shared object libraries use the same format called ELF and that libc.so, in collaboration with code found in crt0.o (on *nixes), part of the compiler, actually is responsible for setting up the runtime environment and then call the proper int main(...) function. Without linking against libc.so and crt0.o a program with just int main(...) will not execute. Technically it is possible to set the main function to be the executable entry point, but being started like that the program will not recieve command line arguments, no environment, etc. that’s all in the responsibility of the standard runtime library libc.so

    So libc.so, being also responsible for preparing the call of the int main(...) function can easily determine if it got linked by some other program, or if it is “stand alone”. If the process got started through the libc.so entry point in it will display this message, then exit. Only if the process is started through an executables binary entry point, which the binary recieves through that magic crt0.o the process will run as usual.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I love static analysis and compile-time checks, almost to a fault, but most of
Most of the time, I am doing this way. class a { public: ~
Here's a piece of code that takes most time in my program, according to
Community wiki'ed already, folks. What part of Apache Commons saves you the most time?
Most of time we represent concepts which can never be less than 0. For
Most of time, the source of file uploading errors are that we forget to
I was given an unusual request recently that I'm having the most difficult time
For a particular segment of Java code, I'd like to measure: Execution time (most
Most of the time, I've seen release management handled as a defined process with
Most of the time the autocomplete feature in Vim works nicely for me, but

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.