Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5965159
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T19:33:46+00:00 2026-05-22T19:33:46+00:00

multimap offers the methods lower_bound and upper_bound . Both may return an iterator to

  • 0

multimap offers the methods lower_bound and upper_bound. Both may return an iterator to a value with key greater than the desired, with lower_bound possibly yielding exactly the desired.

Now I want an iterator to a value where the key is strictly less the requested. If it were a map rather than multimap, this would be relatively simple to achieve as described here:
Returning the greatest key strictly less than the given key in a C++ Map.
But in a multimap, decrementing an iterator is not guaranteed to make it point to a strictly smaller key. So I would need to decrement repeatedly, until a smaller key is found. Not particularly nice.

Is there a more elegant way of doing this?

The keys will in general be floating-point.


My apologies, it turns out that you can actually do it with a single decrement. I just placed it wrong in my program, that was the real error.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T19:33:48+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 7:33 pm

    lower_bound points to the smallest element greater than or equal to the argument (or end). Thus decrementing it once gives you the desired element (if it exists).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a dilemma of whether to have a multimap <int key, int value>
I have a std::multimap where key is a custom class. Something like this: Class
Suppose that I have a multimap (which maps multiple values to a single key),
hello i got an iterator running on a multimap ,my multimap includes two fields
I need some help understanding how stdext::hash_multimap's lower_bound, upper_bound and equal_range work (at least
I have a STL::multimap and I search it with equal_range to return an upper
My requirement is to delete a a value from the multimap and not the
What are the usual rules for Iterator invalidation when operating over STL container classes(Vector,Dequeue,list,map,multimap,set,multiset).
I have std::list<multimap<std::string,std::string>::iterator> > Now i have new element: multimap<std::string,std::string>::value_type aNewMmapValue(foo1,test) I want to
I'm about to refactor some duplicated code. Two functions both search in a multimap

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.