Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6654467
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T01:23:37+00:00 2026-05-26T01:23:37+00:00

My critical section code does not work!!! Backgrounder.run IS able to modify MESSAGE_QUEUE g_msgQueue

  • 0

My critical section code does not work!!!
Backgrounder.run IS able to modify MESSAGE_QUEUE g_msgQueue and LockSections destructor hadn’t been called yet !!!

Extra code :

typedef std::vector<int> MESSAGE_LIST; // SHARED OBJECT .. MUST LOCK!

class MESSAGE_QUEUE : MESSAGE_LIST{
public:
    MESSAGE_LIST * m_pList;
    MESSAGE_QUEUE(MESSAGE_LIST* pList){ m_pList = pList; }
    ~MESSAGE_QUEUE(){ }
    /* This class will be shared between threads that means any 
     * attempt to access it MUST be inside a critical section. 
     */
    void Add( int messageCode ){ if(m_pList) m_pList->push_back(messageCode); }

    int getLast()
    { 
      if(m_pList){ 
        if(m_pList->size() == 1){ 
          Add(0x0); 
        } 
        m_pList->pop_back(); 
        return m_pList->back(); 
      } 
    }
    void removeLast()
    { 
      if(m_pList){ 
        m_pList->erase(m_pList->end()-1,m_pList->end()); 
      } 
    }
};

class Backgrounder{
public:
    MESSAGE_QUEUE* m_pMsgQueue;
    static void __cdecl Run( void* args){
        MESSAGE_QUEUE* s_pMsgQueue = (MESSAGE_QUEUE*)args;
        if(s_pMsgQueue->getLast() == 0x45)printf("It's a success!");
        else printf("It's a trap!");
    }
    Backgrounder(MESSAGE_QUEUE* pMsgQueue) 
    { 
      m_pMsgQueue = pMsgQueue; 
      _beginthread(Run,0,(void*)m_pMsgQueue); 
    }
    ~Backgrounder(){ }
};

int main(){

    MESSAGE_LIST g_List;
    CriticalSection crt;
    ErrorHandler err;
    LockSection lc(&crt,&err); // Does not work , see question #2
    MESSAGE_QUEUE g_msgQueue(&g_List);
    g_msgQueue.Add(0x45); 
    printf("%d",g_msgQueue.getLast()); 
    Backgrounder back_thread(&g_msgQueue);


    while(!kbhit());
    return 0;
}

#ifndef CRITICALSECTION_H
#define CRITICALSECTION_H
#include <windows.h>
#include "ErrorHandler.h"


class CriticalSection{
    long m_nLockCount;
    long m_nThreadId;
    typedef CRITICAL_SECTION cs;
    cs m_tCS;
public:
    CriticalSection(){
        ::InitializeCriticalSection(&m_tCS);
        m_nLockCount = 0;
        m_nThreadId = 0;
    }
    ~CriticalSection(){ ::DeleteCriticalSection(&m_tCS); }
    void Enter(){ ::EnterCriticalSection(&m_tCS);  }
    void Leave(){  ::LeaveCriticalSection(&m_tCS); }
    void Try();
};


class LockSection{
    CriticalSection* m_pCS;
    ErrorHandler * m_pErrorHandler;
    bool m_bIsClosed;
public:
    LockSection(CriticalSection* pCS,ErrorHandler* pErrorHandler){
        m_bIsClosed = false;
        m_pCS = pCS;
        m_pErrorHandler = pErrorHandler;
            // 0x1AE is code prefix for critical section header
        if(!m_pCS)m_pErrorHandler->Add(0x1AE1); 
        if(m_pCS)m_pCS->Enter();
    }
    ~LockSection(){
        if(!m_pCS)m_pErrorHandler->Add(0x1AE2);
        if(m_pCS && m_bIsClosed == false)m_pCS->Leave();
    }
    void ForceCSectionClose(){
        if(!m_pCS)m_pErrorHandler->Add(0x1AE3);
        if(m_pCS){m_pCS->Leave();m_bIsClosed = true;}
    }
};

/*

Safe class basic structure;

class SafeObj
{
     CriticalSection m_cs;

public:
    void SafeMethod()
    {
        LockSection myLock(&m_cs);
        //add code to implement the method ...

    }
};



*/
#endif
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T01:23:38+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 1:23 am

    Two questions in one. I don’t know about the first, but the critical section part is easy to explain. The background thread isn’t trying to claim the lock and so, of course, is not blocked. You need to make the critical section object crt visible to the thread so that it can lock it.

    The way to use this lock class is that each section of code that you want serialised must create a LockSection object and hold on to it until the end of the serialised block:

    Thread 1:

    {
        LockSection lc(&crt,&err);
        //operate on shared object from thread 1
    }
    

    Thread 2:

    {
        LockSection lc(&crt,&err);
        //operate on shared object from thread 2
    }
    

    Note that it has to be the same critical section instance crt that is used in each block of code that is to be serialised.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I need to work with array from several threads, so I use CRITICAL SECTION
I have critical section in my application which contains a lot of code: which
In Java, the idiomatic way to declare critical sections in the code is the
I have used IPC in Win32 code a while ago - critical sections, events,
I'm just wondering, if a thread is in a critical section, can it be
Why does following code raise an exception (in createObjects call to map::at ) alternativly
I'm using a spin lock to protect a very small critical section. Contention happens
When trying run this code: At first it prints Process some_id BEFORE enter for
Is a mutex lock needed around a section of code that involves pointer indirection
I need realize critical section in Qt (4.7.3, Windows XP). For example, public slot:

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.