Home/ Questions/Q 6764051
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-26T14:32:55+00:00

Not sure if there’s a offical name, but by DataContext I mean an object

  • 0

Not sure if there’s a “offical” name, but by DataContext I mean an object which transparently maintains objects’ state, providing change tracking, statement-of-work functionality, concurrency and probably many other useful features. (In Entity Framework it’s ObjectContext, in NHibernate – ISession).

Eventually I’ve come to an idea that something like that should be implemented in my application (it uses mongodb as back-end, and mongodb’s partial updates are fine when we’re able to track a certain property change).

So actually, I’ve got several questions on this subject

  1. Could anyone formulate requirements to DataContext? – what’s your understanding of it’s tasks and responsibilities? (The most relevant I’ve managed to find is Esposito’s book, but unfortunately that’s at about msdn samples level).

  2. What would you suggest for changes tracking implementation? (In simplest way it’s possible to track changes “manually” in entities, but requires coding and mixes dal with business logic, so I mostly interested in “automatic” way, keeping entities more poco).

  3. Is there way to utilize some existing solution? (I hoped nhibernate infrastructure would allow plugging-in custom module to work with mongo behind the scene, but not sure if it allows working with non-sql dbs at all).

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    The DataContext (ObjectContext or DbContext in EF) is nothing else than an implementation of the Unit of Work (UoW)/Repository pattern.

    I suggest you Fowler’s book on Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture in which he outlines the implementation of several persistency patterns. That might be a help in implementing your own solution.

    1. A DataContext basically needs to fullfil the job of a UoW. It needs to handle the reading and management of objects that are involved in a given lifecycle (i.e. HTTP request), s.t. there are no two objects in memory that represent the same record on the DB. Moreover it needs to provide some change tracking for performing partial updates to the DB (as you already mentioned).

    2. To what regards change tracking, I fully agree that polluting properties with change events etc is bad. One of the recent templates introduced in EF4.1 uses Proxies to handle that and to give the possibility to have plain POCOs.

    • 0