Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7056793
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T03:54:33+00:00 2026-05-28T03:54:33+00:00

On this blog post , there is a sentence as below: This hash is

  • 0

On this blog post, there is a sentence as below:

This hash is unique for the given text. If you use the hash function
on the same text again, you’ll get the same hash. But there is no way
to get the given text from the hash.

Forgive my ignorance on math but I cannot understand why it is not possible to get the given text from the hash.

I would understand if we use one key to encrypt the value and another to decrypt but I cannot figure it out in my mind. What is really going on here behind the scenes?

Anything that clears my mind will be appreciated.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T03:54:34+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 3:54 am

    Hashing is not encryption.

    A hash produces a “digest” – a summary of the input. Whatever the input size, the hash size is always the same (see how MD5 returns the same size result for any input size).

    With a hash, you can get the same hash from several different inputs (hash collisions) – how would you reverse this? Which is the correct input?

    I suggest reading this blog post from Troy Hunt on the matter in order to gain better understanding of hashes, passwords and security.

    Encryption is a different thing – you would get a different cypher from the input and key – and the size of the cypher will tend to be larger as the input is larger. This is reversible if you have the right key.


    Update (following the different comments):

    Though collisions can happen, when using a cryptographically significant hash (like the ones you have posted about), they will be rare and difficult to produce.

    When hashing passwords, always use a salt – this reduces the chances of the hash being reversed by rainbow tables to almost nothing (assuming a good salt has been used).

    You need to decide about the tradeoffs of the cost of hashing (can be processor intensive) and the cost of what you are protecting.

    As you are simply protecting the login details, using the .NET membership provider should provide enough security.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This blog post (slightly annoying page there) (and that's not my blog by the
I stumbled upon that word in this blog post . There is similar question
This blog post demonstrates a way to implement a mutex per string id idiom.
This blog post of December 2008 says that rubygems is broken on Debian-based systems.
Reading this blog post about HttpOnly cookies made me start thinking, is it possible
Just finished reading this blog post: http://www.skorks.com/2010/03/an-interview-question-that-prints-out-its-own-source-code-in-ruby/ In it, the author argues the case
While browsing I came across this blog post about using the Wikipedia API from
I read at a few places (in the doc and in this blog post
As suggested by (among others) Kazi Manzur Rashid in this blog post , I
In this reddit blog post , the author talks about MD5ing the cache keys

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.