Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
One benefit of git is “every one can has full backup” as DVCS with respect to SVN.
I don’t understand well.
Eg, John has a git repo with his branch branch_a, Peter has another git repo with branch_b.
The branch_a and branch_b are different, without sync backup is not complete.
As SVN they also can pull all code to local, is it also a kind of “full backup”?
Every clone of a repository is a full .. well, clone of the repository: It contains every commit. When you say
it is wrong, because in SVN you only checkout a specific revision into the local workspace, that’s all. Especially: When you network connection is down, you cannot do anything with SVN. Because a git repository has every commit (as long as you’ll fetch all of them from time to time, for example via
git fetch --all) you can work as usual and push to the remote one later. Even more if someone breaks the remote repository every developer has a copy of it.