Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 922533
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T19:02:51+00:00 2026-05-15T19:02:51+00:00

One would normally have this query in their sphinx.conf file : sql_query = SELECT

  • 0

One would normally have this query in their sphinx.conf file :

sql_query = SELECT id,text_field1,text_field2,text_field3 FROM table_name

Would there be much difference if I combine all fields into one searchable text field like so?

sql_query = SELECT id, CONCAT(text_field1,text_field2,text_field3) as searchable_text FROM table_name

What benefits does one have over the other?

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T19:02:51+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 7:02 pm

    I think either way is generally fine… however, Sphinx has the ability to focus queries at certain fields (see the extended query syntax examples). If you merge all the columns into one field, you’ll lose that ability.

    You’ll also lose the ability to weight certain fields higher than others.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 492k
  • Answers 492k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Ultimately this will be a problem in namescopes. The value… May 16, 2026 at 10:24 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I'm not sure what kind of adapter you are using,… May 16, 2026 at 10:24 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer static List<T> RemoveDuplicates<T>(List<T> inputList) { Dictionary<T, int> uniqueStore = new… May 16, 2026 at 10:24 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

Ok so this one is strange and I'm thinking there must be a problem
I have a query that I'm trying to figure the django way of doing
I have a query that hit my mind when I was adding an asp.net
Consider this: One mySQL database that has tables and rows and data within it.
I have two classes. One is a management class, which stores a bunch of
I am confused about how to set this up using Cake's conventions. I have
I would like to access the Foo instance foo within my manager method baz
if I have two tables: files(id, owner) and share(file_id, user) , where owner and
I'm not sure how to explain this. So here goes... I'm trying to fit
I am an intermediate programmer, and have decided to learn either common lisp or

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.