Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6203759
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T04:58:18+00:00 2026-05-24T04:58:18+00:00

Particularly: Is Marshal safer? Are pointers faster? int pixel = Marshal.ReadInt32(bitmapData.Scan0, x * 4

  • 0

Particularly: Is Marshal safer? Are pointers faster?

int pixel = Marshal.ReadInt32(bitmapData.Scan0, x * 4 + y * bitmapData.Stride);
int pixel = ((int*)bitmapData.Scan0)[x + y * bitmapData.Stride / 4];
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T04:58:19+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 4:58 am

    There is no difference. If you look at the code from Marshal.ReadInt32 you will see it uses pointers to perform the same thing.

    The only ‘benefit’ with Marshal is that you not have to explicitly allow unsafe code. IIRC, you also require FullTrust to run unsafe code, so that may be a consideration.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Particularly, what is the best snippets package out there? Features: easy to define new
Particularly the bit about live.... jQuery('.something').live('click', function() { jQuery(this).parent('form').reset(); }); I suppose this might
Particularly for 2d games, and particularly silverlight/wpf games. If you think about it, you
More particularly - I have a window handle of another running application. This application
I am particularly interested in Document Libraries, but in terms of general SharePoint lists,
Is it particularly bad to have a very, very large SQL query with lots
This is not yet particularly programing related but, I am very interested in how
Are there any particularly good university lectures available online for download as MP3 (or
I have a particularly slow query due to the vast amount of information being
One thing that seems particularly easy to do in the Flash IDE but difficult

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.