Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8818199
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T05:03:16+00:00 2026-06-14T05:03:16+00:00

Please consider the following mini example // CFoo.hpp class CFoo{ private: static const double

  • 0

Please consider the following mini example

// CFoo.hpp
class CFoo{
private:
    static const double VPI = 0.5;    
public:
    double getVpi();
};

// CFoo.cpp
#include "CFoo.hpp"    
double CFoo::getVpi(){
    double x = -VPI;
    return x;
}

// main.cpp
#include "CFoo.hpp"    
int main(){
    CFoo aFoo();
    return 0;
}

Lining the program with gcc version 4.5.1 produces the error CFoo.cpp: undefined reference to CFoo::VPI. The error dose not occur if

  • VPI is not negated
  • the negation is written as double x = -1 * VPI;
  • Declaration and definition of class CFoo happen in the same file

Do you know the reason for this error?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T05:03:18+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 5:03 am

    There are multiple problems with your code. Primarily, this is not valid C++03:

    class CFoo{
    private:
        static const double VPI = 0.5;    
    // ...
    };
    

    The declaration of a static data member can specify a constant initializer if and only if that initializer is const integral or const enumeration type. 0.5 is neither of these, and hence your code is not valid C++. 9.4.2 Static data members covers this:

    2/ The declaration of a static data member in its class definition is
    not a definition […]The definition for a static data member shall
    appear in a namespace scope enclosing the member’s class definition.
    […]

    4/ If a static data member is of const integral or const enumeration
    type, its declaration in the class definition can specify a
    constant-initializer which shall be an integral constant expression
    (5.19).

    In order to initialize VPI, you must do so in the CPP file:

    header:

    class CFoo{
    private:
        static const double VPI;    
    };
    

    cpp :

    const double CFoo::VPI = 0.5;
    

    Another problem, unrelated, is here:

    int main(){
        CFoo aFoo(); // NOT OK
        return 0;
    

    The expression CFoo aFoo(); doesn’t do what you think it does. You think it declares an object aFoo of type CFoo and initializes it using CFoo‘s default constructor. But what it actually does is declare a function named aFoo taking no parameters, returning a CFoo by value. This is known as the most vexing parse. In order to do what you want, simple omit the parenthesis:

    CFoo aFoo;
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Please consider the following java source: package com.stackoverflow; public class CondSpeed { private static
Please consider following sample @Entity public class Abc { @Id private Long id; @Unindexed
Please consider the following code: public class MyClass extends javax.swing.JFrame { private JTree jTree;
Please consider the following code: public class Person ( public string FirstName {get; set;}
Please consider the following simple use case: public class Foo { public virtual int
Please consider the following code: class Abase{}; class A1:public Abase{}; class A2:public A1{}; //etc
Please consider the following: public class MyObject { public bool B; public string Txt;
Please consider the following: class CMyClass { public: CMyClass() { printf( "Constructor\n" ); }
please consider following code #include <iostream> using namespace std; class Digit { private: int
Please consider the following boilerplate class fragment: class ObjectA : public BaseObject { DerivedMemberA

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.