Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8401713
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 9, 20262026-06-09T21:52:36+00:00 2026-06-09T21:52:36+00:00

Possible Duplicate: C++ delete – It deletes my objects but I can still access

  • 0

Possible Duplicate:
C++ delete – It deletes my objects but I can still access the data?

I am trying to deallocate a block of dynamically created memory in C/C++.
But both the standard methods I used (malloc/free and new/delete) seems to be dysfunctional.
The o/p of both the codes given below is similar.

Here is code using malloc/free :

    #include<stdio.h>
    #include<stdlib.h>

    int main(){
        int * arr;
        arr = (int *)malloc(10*sizeof(int)); // allocating memory
        int i;
        for(i=0;i<10;i++)
            arr[i] = i;
        for(i=0;i<10;i++)
            printf("%d ",arr[i]);
        printf("\n");
        free(arr); // deallocating
        for(i=0;i<10;i++)
            printf("%d ",arr[i]);
        printf("\n");
    }

Here is code using new/delete[] :

    #include<stdio.h>
    #include<stdlib.h>

    int main(){
        int * arr;
        arr = new int[10]; // allocating memory
        for(int i=0;i<10;i++)
            arr[i] = i;
        for(int i=0;i<10;i++)
            printf("%d ",arr[i]);
        printf("\n");
        delete[] arr; // deallocating
        for(int i=0;i<10;i++)
            printf("%d ",arr[i]);
        printf("\n");
    }

But, even after deallocating the memory, none of them are giving any errors.

The o/p in both the cases is same :

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

So, what is the correct method of deallocating memory in C/C++ ? Also, why is the array is getting printed even after deallocating the memory ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-09T21:52:38+00:00Added an answer on June 9, 2026 at 9:52 pm

    Because deallocating/freeing memory does not mean annulling or something like this.

    Freeing memory (most likely) will just mark that piece of memory as free and will not do anything else to it, until something else use it again.

    This makes the freeing memory faster.

    What you have in your code is undefined behaviour, because you’re reading (using) memory, that you’re not supposed to touch at all. It’s “freed” and using that memory could cause anything. A crash in the best case.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: C++ delete - It deletes my objects but I can still access
Possible Duplicate: C++ delete - It deletes my objects but I can still access
Possible Duplicate: C++ delete - It deletes my objects but I can still access
Possible Duplicate: What's the best way to delete all data from a table? Clear
Possible Duplicate: How to delete a zip file using php How can I remove
Possible Duplicate: SQL Delete: can't specify target table for update in FROM clause I
Possible Duplicate: how to delete item from listView? I fetch data from Database in
Possible Duplicate: Any reason to overload global new and delete? In c++ you can
Possible Duplicate: PHP: Is there a command that can delete the contents of a
Possible Duplicate: SQL Delete: can't specify target table for update in FROM clause I'm

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.