Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8891885
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T22:51:10+00:00 2026-06-14T22:51:10+00:00

Possible Duplicate: Is for(;;) faster than while (TRUE)? If not, why do people use

  • 0

Possible Duplicate:
Is “for(;;)” faster than “while (TRUE)”? If not, why do people use it?

I see this

for (;;)
{
  // Some code here
} 

quite often. But what benefits does it offer and why just not choose while(1){}?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T22:51:12+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 10:51 pm

    They produce identical code. There are a couple of reasons why you might prefer for (;;) but it is all just personal preference:

    1. Some compilers will warn you about conditions that are always true. for(;;) will not have that problem.

    2. for (;;) literally reads as “Just loop forever!”, whereas while (true) still appears to have some kind of condition.

    I say pick one and stick with it. It doesn’t matter as long as you don’t switch between them arbitrarily.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: Is “for(;;)” faster than “while (TRUE)”? If not, why do people use
Possible Duplicate: Is for(;;) faster than while (TRUE)? If not, why do people use
Possible Duplicates: Is “for(;;)” faster than “while (TRUE)”? If not, why do people use
Possible Duplicate: C/C++: is GOTO faster than WHILE and FOR? I know this has
Possible Duplicate: What loop is faster, while or for I see in three.js that
Possible Duplicate: Why is string concatenation faster than array join? Usually we need to
Possible Duplicate: Faster DirectoryExists function? I want to check if some file exists on
Possible Duplicate: Is shifting bits faster than multiplying and dividing in Java? .NET? To
Possible Duplicate: is “else if” faster than “switch() case” ? I've encountered a lot
Possible Duplicate: Is it faster to count down than it is to count up?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.