Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8439725
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T08:04:48+00:00 2026-06-10T08:04:48+00:00

Possible Duplicate: Is returning a string literal address from a function safe and portable?

  • 0

Possible Duplicate:
Is returning a string literal address from a function safe and portable?
“life-time” of string literal in C

Hello i am confused somewhat

char *func()
 {

    return "Hello";
 }

Here “Hello” is sequence/array of characters. It is a local variable and it must vanish away as soon as the function returns. Then how come we are able to get the correct value?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T08:04:50+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 8:04 am

    The "Hello" is a string literal and will exist for the lifetime of the program. To quote the relevant sections of the C99 standard:

    • 6.4.5 String literals

    …The multibyte character sequence is then used to initialize an array of static storage duration and length just sufficient to contain the sequence…

    • 6.2.4 Storage durations of objects

    An object whose identifier is declared with external or internal linkage, or with the
    storage-class specifier static has static storage duration. Its lifetime is the entire
    execution of the program and its stored value is initialized only once, prior to program
    startup.

    The return value of the function should be const char* as an attempt to modify a string literal is undefined behaviour.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: Why is this function returning “undefined”? Let's assume I have the following
Possible Duplicate: returning multiple values from a function For example if you want a
Possible Duplicate: Why can you return from a non-void function without returning a value
Possible Duplicate: returning multiple values from a function Suppose i have passed two values
Possible Duplicate: Why can you return from a non-void function without returning a value
Possible Duplicate: MySql datetime not returning time If I do this from consele mysql:
Possible Duplicate: Returning multiple values from a C++ function /************************************************/ /* Name: premserv */
Possible Duplicate: Returning unique_ptr from functions 20.7.1.2 [unique.ptr.single] defines copy constructor like this :
Possible Duplicate: include after PHP 404 header returning “Oops! This link appears to be
Possible Duplicate: Should a function have only one return statement? Hello, gcc 4.4.4 c89

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.