Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 884211
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T12:43:02+00:00 2026-05-15T12:43:02+00:00

Possible Duplicate: Should a function have only one return statement? Hello, gcc 4.4.4 c89

  • 0

Possible Duplicate:
Should a function have only one return statement?

Hello,

gcc 4.4.4 c89

Is it good programming practice to return from 1 point in a function.

I have written a function below. However, I am returning from 2 possible points.

Is this good style?

static int init_data(struct timeout_data_t *timeout_data)
{
    if(timeout_data == NULL) {
        fprintf(stderr, " [ %s ] [ %d ]\n",
            __func__, __LINE__);
        return FALSE;
    }

    /* Assign data */
    timeout_data->seconds = 3;
    timeout_data->func_ptr = timeout_cb;

    return TRUE;
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T12:43:02+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 12:43 pm

    I’ve had managers that lived and died by the 1 return policy for the sake of “readability”, even though it’s much more readable in some cases without it.

    The bottom line is… if the man that signs your paycheck says you’re only going to use 1 return, use 1 return. The best way to do this is

    type myfunc(params) {
        type result = defaultValue;
        // actual function here, word for word
        // replace "return $1" with "result = $1"
    
        return result;
    }
    

    This is a valid way to do things in their book, and will smile at your 1 return policy adherence. Of course, you know using this adds ZERO readability because all you’ve done is replace “return” (which is syntax highlighted) with “result =” which is not. But you’ve made your boss happy, which when you break it all down is what development is about anyway, right? 🙂

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.