Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8649023
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T13:27:25+00:00 2026-06-12T13:27:25+00:00

Possible Duplicate: What are the reasons why Map.get(Object key) is not (fully) generic Why

  • 0

Possible Duplicate:
What are the reasons why Map.get(Object key) is not (fully) generic
Why does Java's TreeSet<E> remove(Object) not take an E

Why does HashSet not restrict type of argument to E here:

public boolean contains(Object o)
public boolean remove(Object o)

like it does for add()

public boolean add(E e)

I mean if the compiler is enforcing that only objects of type E are being added, then the set can’t contain/remove any other type

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T13:27:26+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 1:27 pm

    The difference is that adding must be type-safe to preserve the integrity of the collection, while item checking/removal can afford to be “type-forgiving” without the risk of harming type safety of the collection. In other words, if you add an element of a wrong type, the set will become invalid; on the other hand, if you check for a presence of an element of a wrong type, you’ll simply get back a false. Same goes for remove: if you pass an element of an incompatible type, it’s not going to be in the set +, so the removal is going to be a no-op.


    + Unless you put it in through a hack that exploits type erasure.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: What are the reasons why Map.get(Object key) is not (fully) generic Java
Possible Duplicate: What are the reasons why Map.get(Object key) is not (fully) generic According
Possible Duplicate: What are the reasons why Map.get(Object key) is not (fully) generic From
Possible Duplicate: What are the reasons why Map.get(Object key) is not (fully) generic This
Possible Duplicate: What are the reasons why Map.get(Object key) is not (fully) generic This
Possible Duplicate: What are the reasons why Map.get(Object key) is not (fully) generic I
Possible Duplicate: What does map(&:name) mean in Ruby? In Ruby, I know that if
Possible Duplicate: Eclipse Android SDK slow Content Assist performance For reasons not worth discussing
Possible Duplicate: ClassnotFound exception using java reflection I get exception, java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: SavingAccount , while
Possible Duplicate: Does use of final keyword in Java improve the performance? The final

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.