Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6827197
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T22:14:16+00:00 2026-05-26T22:14:16+00:00

public class counting { private static int counter = 0; public void boolean counterCheck(){

  • 0
public class counting
{
  private static int counter = 0;

  public void boolean counterCheck(){
  counter++;
  if(counter==10)
  counter=0;
  }
}

Method counterCheck can be accessed by multiple threads in my application. I know that static variables are not thread safe. I would appreciate if someone can help me with example or give me reason why I have to synchronize method or block. What will happen if I don’t synchronize?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T22:14:16+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 10:14 pm

    This is not thread safe, AND this pattern of updating a count from multiple threads is probably the #1 way to achieve negative scaling (it runs slower when you add more threads) of a multi-threaded application.

    If you add the necessary locking to make this thread safe then every thread will come to a complete halt while counting. Even if you use atomic operations to update the counter, you will end up bouncing the CPU cache line between every thread that updates the counter.

    Now, this is not a problem if each thread operation takes a considerable amount of time before updating the counter. But if each operation is quick, the counter updates will serialize the operations, causing everything to slow down on all the threads.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

public class WrapperTest { static { print(10); } static void print(int x) { System.out.println(x);
public class abc1 { private String s; public abc1(String s){this.s=s;} public static void main(String
public class Main { public static void main (String args[]) { int nums[]= {2,
public class MyClass { public int Age; public int ID; } public void MyMethod()
public class Test { public static void main(String[] args) { } } class Outer
public class doublePrecision { public static void main(String[] args) { double total = 0;
public class WrapperTest { public static void main(String[] args) { Integer i = 100;
public class Main3 { public static void main(String[] args) { Integer min = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
In the .h file: class counting { public: vector<int> vekto[2]; .... in .cpp counting::counting()
public class PackageTabActivity extends ListActivity{ HashMap<String,Object> hm ; ArrayList<HashMap<String,Object>> applistwithicon ; private static final

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.