Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 513103
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T07:23:17+00:00 2026-05-13T07:23:17+00:00

Qt objects which are allocated with new are pretty much handled for you. Things

  • 0

Qt objects which are allocated with new are pretty much handled for you. Things will get cleaned up at some point (almost always when the parent gets destructed) because Qt objects have a nice parent child relationship.

So my question is this: given that some widgets exist for the life of the application, is it considered good/beneficial to limit the scope of some child widgets? It seems to me that if I don’t the application may not release these objects until the application exits. For example:

MyMainWindow::contextMenu(...) {
    QMenu *menu = new QMenu(this);
    // ...
    menu->exec();
}

vs:

MyMainWindow::contextMenu(...) {
    QMenu *menu = new QMenu(this);
    // ...
    menu->exec();
    delete menu;
}

vs:

MyMainWindow::contextMenu(...) {
    QScopedPointer<QMenu> menu(new QMenu(this));
    // ...
    menu->exec();
}

I like the last one the best, i know that that menu object will be cleaned up immediately, without adding any lines of code to worry about. But, in the first one, it should be cleaned up eventually. Am I wasting my effort trying to manage the lifetime of these Qt widgets? Should I just leave it up to Qt entirely?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T07:23:17+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:23 am

    In your first example, menu will be deleted when this (i.e. the MyMainWindow object) is… which is probably not what you want, since that means that if contextMenu() is called more than once, multiple unseen old QMenu objects will build up in memory, and might eventually use up a lot of RAM if the user never closes/deletes the MyMainWindow for a long time.

    Your second and third examples are both fine. The third is probably slightly better, since it avoids any possibility of a bug ever being introduced where the delete doesn’t get called.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Assume you have some objects which have several fields they can be compared by:
I have some business objects which use: Web.Configuration.WebConfigurationManager.AppSettings.Item(SomeSetting) Now that I'm breaking those objects
I have two LINQ objects which have exactly the same columns and I would
I have an array of objects which populate a UITableView . When a user
I have a set of objects which I iterate through, however I may decide
I've got a polymorphic array of objects which implement two (informal) interfaces. I want
I have an array of FileReference objects which have several listeners attached to each
I have a list of objects which need to be output 2 items per
I have a coworker who writes unit tests for objects which fill their fields
I have two arrays of System.Data.DataRow objects which I want to compare. The rows

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.