Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6103975
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T13:47:23+00:00 2026-05-23T13:47:23+00:00

Rare cases aside, eval() is considered bad practice in JavaScript. I’ve just come across

  • 0

Rare cases aside, eval() is considered bad practice in JavaScript.

I’ve just come across a fragment of code that takes a string and constructs an object by that type name. Error checking, business logic, and context for doing so removed, here’s what it looks like:

function factory(klass) {
  eval("var obj = new " + klass + "()"); // Is there a better way?
  return obj;
}

Is there a better (safer, cleaner, and/or faster) way to accomplish the class creation without using eval?

I’m looking for a generic way to create a class by its name.

e.g., Imagine, for instance, another part of the code dynamically loads JavaScript files, generates code, or allows user extensions, but then some other part of the code needs to make that class without the factory having prior knowledge of its existence.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T13:47:23+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 1:47 pm

    You can register classes with your factory object and than create them by string name:

    var allClasses = [];
    allClasses["MyClass"] = function(){return new MyClass();}
    allClasses["MyStruct"] = function() {return {F1:"", F2:42};}
    
    function factory(klass) 
    {
        if (!allClasses[klass]) throw "Bad name!";
        return allClasses[klass]();
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Note that the following are examples of the rare cases where dotNet reflector does
I have two entities that usually have one-to-many relationship, but in rare cases should
While I've seen rare cases where private inheritance was needed, I've never encountered a
It's rare that I hear someone using Inversion of Control (Ioc) principle with .Net.
I have a Java Applet that uses AWT. In some (rare) circumstances, the platform
I like Scala's propose of operator precedence but in some rare cases, unmodified rules
I've been using ExternalInterface up until now in the rare cases I needed to
Is there some rare language construct I haven't encountered (like the few I've learned
It seems rare to read of a Python virtual machine while in Java virtual
I have an application that has multiple states, with each state responding to input

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.