Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8691505
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T00:08:03+00:00 2026-06-13T00:08:03+00:00

Reading accelearated C++: theres a discussion on whether int* i or int *i should

  • 0

Reading accelearated C++: theres a discussion on whether int* i or int *i should be used. And that int* p, q is actually int (*p), q. So I suppose q is just an int? (not a pointer)? Then is it possible to declare a bunch of pointers?

I don’t suppose int *p, *q will work?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T00:08:05+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 12:08 am

    I don’t suppose int *p, *q will work?

    It will, test it. That’s correct way to do this.

    Another option, to avoid such confusion, is to declare them separately

    int* p;
    int* q;
    

    So I suppose q is just an int

    in int* p, q – yes, it is int, and not a pointer.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Reading through the CKEditor documentation , I see that they have an option to
Reading over some example Objective C code just now. @property (nonatomic, strong) IBOutlet UILabel
I'm working on an a GPU accelerated program that requires the reading of an
Reading the code of many javascript libraries, I see that many developers use to
I've been reading several references like X is GPU accelerated and Y is not
Reading all about PHP frameworks, CodeIgniter seems really nice in that I like it's
Reading about and using the Amazon Web Services, I'm not really able to grasp
Reading about the GitHub wikis, I saw that they support several lightweight markup languages
OK thought I understood IDipose but just reading the best practices section of Accelerated
Reading the Google Developers PHP performance tips I saw that it isn't recommended to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.