Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 564801
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T12:48:18+00:00 2026-05-13T12:48:18+00:00

Right now I do something like this and it seems messy if I end

  • 0

Right now I do something like this and it seems messy if I end having a lot of functions I want to reference in my DLL. Is there a better and cleaner way of accessing the functions without having to create a typedef for each function definition so that it will compile and load the function properly. I mean the function definitions are already in the .h file and I shouldn’t have to redeclare them after I load the function (or do I?) Is there a better solution than using LoadLibary? I don’t necessarily need that function if there is a way I can do the same thing within Visual Studio 2005 project settings.


BHannan_Test_Class.h

#include "stdafx.h"
#include <windows.h>

#ifndef BHANNAN_TEST_CLASS_H_
#define BHANNAN_TEST_CLASS_H_

extern "C" {

    // Returns n! (the factorial of n).  For negative n, n! is defined to be 1.
    int __declspec (dllexport) Factorial(int n);

    // Returns true iff n is a prime number.
    bool __declspec (dllexport) IsPrime(int n);

}

#endif  // BHANNAN_TEST_CLASS_H_

BHannan_Test_Class.cpp

#include "stdafx.h"
#include "BHannan_Test_Class.h"

// Returns n! (the factorial of n).  For negative n, n! is defined to be 1.
int Factorial(int n) {
  int result = 1;
  for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
    result *= i;
  }

  return result;
}

// Returns true iff n is a prime number.
bool IsPrime(int n) {
  // Trivial case 1: small numbers
  if (n <= 1) return false;

  // Trivial case 2: even numbers
  if (n % 2 == 0) return n == 2;

  // Now, we have that n is odd and n >= 3.

  // Try to divide n by every odd number i, starting from 3
  for (int i = 3; ; i += 2) {
    // We only have to try i up to the squre root of n
    if (i > n/i) break;

    // Now, we have i <= n/i < n.
    // If n is divisible by i, n is not prime.
    if (n % i == 0) return false;
  }

  // n has no integer factor in the range (1, n), and thus is prime.
  return true;
}

dll_test.cpp

#include <BHannan_Test_Class.h>

typedef int (*FactorialPtr) (int);
FactorialPtr myFactorial=NULL;

// Tests factorial of negative numbers.
TEST(FactorialTest, Negative) {

    HMODULE myDLL = LoadLibrary("BHannan_Sample_DLL.dll");

    if(myDLL) {
        myFactorial = (FactorialPtr) GetProcAddress(myDLL,"Factorial");

        if(myFactorial)
        {
            EXPECT_EQ(1, myFactorial(-5));
            EXPECT_EQ(1, myFactorial(-1));
            EXPECT_TRUE(myFactorial(-10) > 0);
        }

        FreeLibrary(myDLL);
    }

}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T12:48:18+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 12:48 pm

    After building your .dll get the .lib file nearby and link your test application with it. Use functions as they are declared in .h

    There’s a minor change you need to do in your header file:

    #ifdef EXPORTS_API
      #define MY_API_EXPORT __declspec (dllexport)
    #else
      #define MY_API_EXPORT __declspec (dllimport)
    #endif
    
    extern "C" {
        int MY_API_EXPORT Factorial(int n);
    
        // do the same for other functions
    }
    

    This way, when building your dll you define EXPORTS_API in your project settings and functions get exported, in the client application, no need to define anything.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

So what I have right now is something like this: PropertyInfo[] info = obj.GetType().GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public);
Right now I'm doing something like this: RewriteRule ^/?logout(/)?$ logout.php RewriteRule ^/?config(/)?$ config.php I
Right now we just use something like this stopWatch.Start(); try { method(); } finally
Right now, I have code that looks something like this: Private Sub ShowReport(ByVal reportName
I'm currently doing something like this in some code I'm working on right now:
Right now I have something like this.... Item.find({}, function (docs) { for (var i
Right now I am using a list, and was expecting something like: verts =
Right now my ant task looks like. <javadoc sourcepath=${source} destdir=${doc}> <link href=http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/ /> </javadoc>
right now I'm creating an array and using: render :json => @comments This would
I am using CURL to execute HTTP requests. I get back something like this:

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.