Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 687865
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T02:10:16+00:00 2026-05-14T02:10:16+00:00

Say I have a resource (e.g. a filehandle or network socket) which has to

  • 0

Say I have a resource (e.g. a filehandle or network socket) which has to be freed:

open my $fh, "<", "filename" or die "Couldn't open filename: $!";
process($fh);
close $fh or die "Couldn't close filename: $!";

Suppose that process might die. Then the code block exits early, and $fh doesn’t get closed.

I could explicitly check for errors:

open my $fh, "<", "filename" or die "Couldn't open filename: $!";
eval {process($fh)};
my $saved_error = $@;
close $fh or die "Couldn't close filename: $!";
die $saved_error if $saved_error;

but this kind of code is notoriously difficult to get right, and only gets more complicated when you add more resources.

In C++ I would use RAII to create an object which owns the resource, and whose destructor would free it. That way, I don’t have to remember to free the resource, and resource cleanup happens correctly as soon as the RAII object goes out of scope – even if an exception is thrown. Unfortunately in Perl a DESTROY method is unsuitable for this purpose as there are no guarantees for when it will be called.

Is there a Perlish way to ensure resources are automatically freed like this even in the presence of exceptions? Or is explicit error checking the only option?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T02:10:16+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 2:10 am

    I think that’s what Scope::Guard was designed to help with.

    #!/usr/bin/perl
    
    use strict; use warnings;
    use Scope::Guard;
    
    my $filename = 'file.test';
    
    open my $fh, '>', $filename
        or die "Couldn't open '$filename': $!";
    
    {
        my $sg = Scope::Guard->new(
            sub {
                close $fh or die "Could not close";
                warn "file closed properly\n";
            }
        );
    
        process($fh);
    }
    
    sub process { die "cannot process\n" }
    

    However, as @Philip notes in the comments, Scope::Guard utilizes the DESTROY method which creates some uncertainty as to when the scope exit code will be run. Modules such as Hook::Scope and Sub::ScopeFinalizer look fine as well although I have never used them.

    I do like Try::Tiny for its clean interface and sheer simplicity and it will help you handle exceptions the correct way:

    #!/usr/bin/perl
    
    use strict; use warnings;
    use Try::Tiny;
    
    my $filename = 'file.test';
    
    open my $fh, '>', $filename
        or die "Couldn't open '$filename': $!";
    
    try {
        process($fh);
    }
    catch {
        warn $_;
    }
    finally {
        close $fh
            and warn "file closed properly\n";
    };
    
    sub process { die "cannot process\n" }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say I have the following threading in my Rails web application: class MyController
I'm wondering how Spring enlists resources for a given annotated transaction. Say I have
I have a program which runs in windows explorer. Ordinarily, if no other programs
I have a sequence of elements. The sequence can only be iterated once and
This is a resource-allocation problem. My goal is to run a query to fetch
I have been working on a method to sync core data stored in an
To see the problems, please follow these steps (I am coding in C#): Put
One level up from this question , what would be the way to store
I am looking for either a best practice, supported, guide from Microsoft or a
This is mostly a philosophical question about the best way to interpret the HTTP

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.