Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 687865
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T02:10:16+00:00 2026-05-14T02:10:16+00:00

Say I have a resource (e.g. a filehandle or network socket) which has to

  • 0

Say I have a resource (e.g. a filehandle or network socket) which has to be freed:

open my $fh, "<", "filename" or die "Couldn't open filename: $!";
process($fh);
close $fh or die "Couldn't close filename: $!";

Suppose that process might die. Then the code block exits early, and $fh doesn’t get closed.

I could explicitly check for errors:

open my $fh, "<", "filename" or die "Couldn't open filename: $!";
eval {process($fh)};
my $saved_error = $@;
close $fh or die "Couldn't close filename: $!";
die $saved_error if $saved_error;

but this kind of code is notoriously difficult to get right, and only gets more complicated when you add more resources.

In C++ I would use RAII to create an object which owns the resource, and whose destructor would free it. That way, I don’t have to remember to free the resource, and resource cleanup happens correctly as soon as the RAII object goes out of scope – even if an exception is thrown. Unfortunately in Perl a DESTROY method is unsuitable for this purpose as there are no guarantees for when it will be called.

Is there a Perlish way to ensure resources are automatically freed like this even in the presence of exceptions? Or is explicit error checking the only option?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T02:10:16+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 2:10 am

    I think that’s what Scope::Guard was designed to help with.

    #!/usr/bin/perl
    
    use strict; use warnings;
    use Scope::Guard;
    
    my $filename = 'file.test';
    
    open my $fh, '>', $filename
        or die "Couldn't open '$filename': $!";
    
    {
        my $sg = Scope::Guard->new(
            sub {
                close $fh or die "Could not close";
                warn "file closed properly\n";
            }
        );
    
        process($fh);
    }
    
    sub process { die "cannot process\n" }
    

    However, as @Philip notes in the comments, Scope::Guard utilizes the DESTROY method which creates some uncertainty as to when the scope exit code will be run. Modules such as Hook::Scope and Sub::ScopeFinalizer look fine as well although I have never used them.

    I do like Try::Tiny for its clean interface and sheer simplicity and it will help you handle exceptions the correct way:

    #!/usr/bin/perl
    
    use strict; use warnings;
    use Try::Tiny;
    
    my $filename = 'file.test';
    
    open my $fh, '>', $filename
        or die "Couldn't open '$filename': $!";
    
    try {
        process($fh);
    }
    catch {
        warn $_;
    }
    finally {
        close $fh
            and warn "file closed properly\n";
    };
    
    sub process { die "cannot process\n" }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Let's say I have a resource file which exports mc1 with 4 frames in
Say I have resource defined as /thing/{id}/ and my id is a int in
Let's say I have a resource that can have two different behaviors when delete
How can I model roles views restfully? Lets say I have a resource that
Say I have a things resource with a view helper method such as: module
Lets say I have a message resource. Somewhere in the html I have: <%=
I know REST is meant to be resource-oriented, which roughly translates to CRUD operations
I'm working on an API that accepts data from remote clients, some of which
When Using a thread-local database connection, closure of the connection is required when the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.