Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8120977
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T05:20:01+00:00 2026-06-06T05:20:01+00:00

Say I have code like this: class Car def test_drive!; end end class AssemblyLine

  • 0

Say I have code like this:

class Car
  def test_drive!; end
end

class AssemblyLine
  def produce!
    car = Car.new
    car.test_drive!
  end
end

Now, using RSpec I want to test/spec AssemblyLine without exercising Car as well. I hear we don’t do dependency injection in Ruby, we stub new instead:

describe AssemblyLine
  before do
    Car.stub(:new).and_return(double('Car'))
  end

  describe '#produce'
    it 'test-drives new cars' do
      the_new_instance_of_car.should_receive(:test_drive) # ???
      AssemblyLine.new.produce!
    end
  end
end

The problem, as you can see, is with the_new_instance_of_car. It doesn’t exist yet before produce is called, and after produce returns it’s too late to set any method call expectations on it.

I can think of a workaround involving a callback in the stubbed new method, but that’s rather hideous. There must be a more elegant and idiomatic way to solve this seemingly common problem. Right…?


Update: here’s how I solved it.

describe AssemblyLine
  def stub_new_car(&block)
    Car.stub(:new) do
      car = double('Car')
      block.call(car) if block
      car
    end
  end

  before { stub_new_car } # to make other tests use the stub as well

  describe '#produce'
    it 'test-drives new cars' do
      stub_new_car { |car| car.should_receive(:test_drive) }
      AssemblyLine.new.produce!
    end
  end
end
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T05:20:05+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 5:20 am

    You can set an expectation on the test double:

    describe AssemblyLine do
      let(:car) { double('Car') }
      before { Car.stub(:new) { car } }
    
      describe "#produce" do
        it "test-drives new cars" do
          car.should_receive(:test_drive!)
          AssemblyLine.new.produce!
        end
      end
    end
    

    You can also call any_instance on the class (as of RSpec 2.7, I think):

    describe AssemblyLine do
      describe "#produce" do
        it "test-drives new cars" do
          Car.any_instance.should_receive(:test_drive!)
          AssemblyLine.new.produce!
        end
      end
    end
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Say I have code like this: abstract class Animal[T <: Animal[T]] { def mateWith(that:
Let's say we have code looks like this module TM def aa puts aa
Let's say that I have a block of code like this: keysPressed = new
Let's say I have some code (using CherryPy) that looks like this: import cherrypy
Say I have a class Code defined like this, with a user specified type
Long story short Say I have the following code: // a class like this
Say you have a class like this: class MyClass: def __init__(self, var1): self.var =
Let's say I have code that looks like this: public abstract class ResourceDownloaderBaseImpl implements
Let's say I have some code like this in AS3 for(...) thing = new
Say I have some code like this: class Foo { public: Foo(int v) :

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.