Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9163071
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T14:21:25+00:00 2026-06-17T14:21:25+00:00

Scala seems to be very good at serializing scala.xml.Elem (on my machine it performs

  • 0

Scala seems to be very good at serializing scala.xml.Elem (on my machine it performs approximately 150k per seconds), however deserialization seems to be quite slow (10k per second) using XML.loadString

What is the fastest alternative?

Thank you

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T14:21:27+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 2:21 pm

    Whilst its not an answer to faster scala.xml.Elem deserializing Scales Xml performs very well with a far lower memory usage. It provides a large range of functionality that’s not present in the default library either.

    Scales lets you configure the trade-offs between significantly lower memory usage and parsing performance. The default aims to strike a great balance.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm very new to Scala, but from what I've read it seems the ideal
Some things in Scala seems opaque to me such as the following when to
I am using Z3 with SMT2 via C API/JNA/Scala and seems to work pretty
So far implicit parameters in Scala do not look good for me -- it
I'm considering porting a very simple text-templating library to scala, mostly as an exercise
In Haskell, Iteratee based I/O seems very attractive. Iteratees are a composable, safe, fast
A very newbie question in Scala - how do I do repeat function until
I realize the question seems very broad and subjective, but I'm mostly looking for
It seems that I have a very common task, but I'm missing some keywords
I'm very new to Scala and I have run in to a problem. I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.