Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 993497
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T06:25:57+00:00 2026-05-16T06:25:57+00:00

Search logic is automagically doing an INNER JOIN on one the tables in my

  • 0

Search logic is automagically doing an INNER JOIN on one the tables in my DB, is there a way to get it to specify to not include the user column in that second table?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T06:25:58+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 6:25 am

    Possibly, but that’s a complicated (and therefore not the best) solution to your ambiguous column problem. The ambiguity occurs presumably because you have some conditions referrring to a column name and both tables have that column. The proper way to deal with that is to simply specify the table names in your query, like

    @topics = Topic.find(:all, :include => [:posts], :conditions => ["topics.user_id <> ?", current_user.id])
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Search for good JAVA lib for playing with POST-GET requests - Is there any
I am using search logic to filter results on company listing page. The user
I got one main search field always visible at the site and a login
Search for good Java lib for playing with Sockets connections - Is there any
I search for a good and handy user interface to put items from list
I'm using search logic to filter and order my results but it removes records
I'm using the code below for my search logic, basically, it evaluates a field
I've done this befor but with all my memory, search efforts and logic failing
I have a Search model and controller. The business logic is that if the
I have to write logic for expanding queries for solr search engine. I am

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.