Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 945177
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T22:42:46+00:00 2026-05-15T22:42:46+00:00

Similar to this question but with objects instead of pointers. If I have the

  • 0

Similar to this question but with objects instead of pointers.

If I have the following code

Foo f;
vector<Foo> vect;
vect.push_back(f);
vect.erase(vect.begin());

Where does my object go? Is delete called on it? What if someone else holds a pointer to it? Is this a memory leak?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T22:42:47+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 10:42 pm

    push_back stores a copy of f in the vector, and erase destroys it. f itself is not affected by that.

    All pointers, references and iterators to an element in a vector are invalidated when you erase it. Using them to access the element after erase yields undefined behavior.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have checked this similar question, but the suggestions did not solve my problem:
Note: This is similar to this question but it is not the same. I
I found this question but it was only similar and, more importantly, dated by
This question is similar to this one, but with an extra wrinkle: Auto-removing all
This is similar to this question , but I thought I'd reword it a
This is similar to (but different from) this question . Here is some simple
This is similar to my previous question but it didnt work with the Kindle
I found this similar question here , but this is really old. Was it
My question is similar to this MySQL question, but intended for SQL Server: Is
This question is similar to mine, but does not contain an answer. I want

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.