Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6716337
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T08:43:16+00:00 2026-05-26T08:43:16+00:00

So if there are two methods: def foo method1 method2 end How could one

  • 0

So if there are two methods:

def foo
   method1
   method2
end

How could one check to see if all of these ‘method1/method2’ have been executed in the method themselves? How could the amount of times that the method is being called being counted. The code also needs to be inside the method1 or method2 to check this.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T08:43:17+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 8:43 am

    It’s probably easy to do it another way, but this way seems clean and modular.

    Create a proxy class called method_counter which removes it’s own methods, and defines missing_method, get_method_counts, and a constructor. You can see examples of how to do that here: http://www.binarylogic.com/2009/08/07/how-to-create-a-proxy-class-in-ruby/

    Now the constructor takes any other object, and stores it internally. The get method counts method returns a hash of methodname => count objects.

    The missing method gets called by ruby whenever someone calls a method on the proxy object that doesnt exist… And then you should implement it to call the same method on the contained object (passed in the constructor) after updating the method count hash.

    This implementation is clean because you have not touched the target objects code, and the calling code will only have to change 1 line (the constructor of the target object to create a proxy instead).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have these two methods on a class that differ only in one method
I wrote two methods to check there performance public class Test1 { private String
I'm not sure if there is a difference in these two methods. If so,
These two methods exhibit repetition: public static Expression<Func<Foo, FooEditDto>> EditDtoSelector() { return f =>
Say you have these two methods: Number 1: void AddPerson(Person person) { // Validate
Of the two methods below, which do you prefer to read? Is there another
These two methods appear to behave the same to me public IEnumerable<string> GetNothing() {
If these two methods are simply synonyms, why do people go to the trouble
I came across these two methods to concatenate strings: Common part: char* first= First;
I thought these two methods were (memory allocation-wise) equivalent, however, I was seeing out

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.