Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 84947
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T22:00:43+00:00 2026-05-10T22:00:43+00:00

So standard Agile philosophy would recommend making your domain classes simple POCOs which are

  • 0

So standard Agile philosophy would recommend making your domain classes simple POCOs which are Persisted using a separate proxy layer via data access objects (like NHibernate does it). It also recommends getting as high unit test coverage as possible.

Does it make any sense to write tests for these simple POCO objects? Say I have a class which looks like this:

public class Container {  public int ContainerId { get; set;}  public string Name { get; set;}  public IList<Item> Contents { get; set;} } 

What useful unit tests can I write for this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T22:00:43+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 10:00 pm

    Typically a value object like that doesn’t need to have its own tests. You’ll get coverage from the classes that use it to actually do something.

    The unit tests are designed to test behavior. No behavior? No need for a test.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I recently started with the 'Agile web development with Rails' book by pragmatic programmers
I have now witnessed two companies move to agile development with Scrum. In both
To execute an Agile project you first need a contract. No contract – no
I am writing an application using an object database ( db4o ) and in
I remember a while ago on a Stack Overflow podcast Jeff Atwood was talking
I've been working on a project that can't be described as 'small' anymore (40+
This is not really a technical programming question, but has more to do with
We have an architecture where we provide each customer Business Intelligence-like services for their
I have a rails app that has picked up a bit of traction, but

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.