Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 313125
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T08:04:45+00:00 2026-05-12T08:04:45+00:00

Standard SEO caveat: It’s a black box, and the algorithms are proprietary, and trying

  • 0

Standard SEO caveat: It’s a black box, and the algorithms are proprietary, and trying to predict and game the search engines is a crappy way to make a living.

That said, what are the baseline steps you want to take to make sure your content is visible to the major search engines (Google, Bing, etc.)

I’m specifically curious as to what role your URI Information Architecture plays. It’s common wisdom that you want keywords in your URI, and you want to avoid the query-string laden approach, but what else beyond that?

A quick example of what I’m talking about. Based on something I read on a forum, I recently exposed a /category/* hierarchy on my site. In the following weeks I noticed a sharp uptick in my page views.

I’m curious what other basic steps a site/weblog should take with its URIs to ensure a baseline visibility.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 3 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T08:04:45+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 8:04 am

    A few URI tips that have kept me ranking:

    • Write URIs in English but include a unique ID. SO does this well: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1278157/seo-and-uri-structure
    • Stay consistent when linking to a page: domain.com/, domain.com/index and domain.com/index.php are different URIs
    • Use .html extensions, or purely /one/two/ directories for pages

    There’s probably hundreds of other tips! The structure of linking plays a very important role too…

    • Logically break your site down into many categories/subcategories
    • Link all pages back to your homepage
    • Don’t link to hundreds of pages from your homepage

    EDIT: Oh I forgot a very important one – a proper 404 response!

    Hopefully that helps a bit

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Standard Fancybox places an overlay on the entire body. Is there a way in
In standard SQL, is there a way to say: select mubmle as x from
The standard way of creating URLs in grails is: <a href=${createLink(controller:'news', action: 'show', params:
Some standard books on Algorithms produce this: 0 ≤ f( n ) ≤ c⋅g(
I'm trying to figure out a decent solution (especially from the SEO side) for
Standard convex hull algorithms will not work with (longitude, latitude)-points, because standard algorithms assume
Standard WPF combo box has the type in functionality. That is: when combo box
Standard deviation analysis can be a useful way to find outliers. Is there a
Standard lesscss mixin: .box-shadow(@val) { -moz-box-shadow: @val; box-shadow: @val; } However, in pure CSS
I currently use the following rules to redirect from standard URLs to SEO URLs:

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.