Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 751495
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T14:40:24+00:00 2026-05-14T14:40:24+00:00

std::vector<T> vec; // line #1 vec.reserve(100); // line #2 I am wondering if line

  • 0
std::vector<T> vec;   // line #1
vec.reserve(100);     // line #2

I am wondering if line #1 triggers a small allocation (say, memory for 10 Ts), or if the first allocation happens on line #2. Does the standard say anything about that?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T14:40:24+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 2:40 pm

    It’s implementation defined. The default-constructor for vector does not need to allocate anything, but it’s permissible for an implementation to do so.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

std::vector<Foo> vec; Foo foo(...); assert(vec.size() == 0); vec.reserve(100); // I've reserved 100 elems vec[50]
The first solution is: std::vector<int> *vec = new std::vector<int>; assert(vec != NULL); // ...
I'd like to use a std::vector to control a given piece of memory. First
If I have a vector of pairs: std::vector<std::pair<int, int> > vec; Is there and
#include iostream #include vector class ABC { }; class VecTest { std::vector<ABC> vec; public:
void foo() { struct Foo { .. }; std::vector<Foo> vec; // why is this
If std::vector and friends are self resizing, does that mean if I declare a
With a vector defined as std::vector<std::string> , Wondering why the following is valid: if
In code below: map<string,vector<int>> create(ifstream& in, const vector<string>& vec) { /*holds string and line
I know I can do this: std::vector<double> vec; std::back_insert_iterator<std::vector<double> > it( back_inserter(vec) ); it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.