Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6357819
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T23:14:40+00:00 2026-05-24T23:14:40+00:00

Suppose I have an object with many members: class Example { AnotherClass member1; AnotherClass

  • 0

Suppose I have an object with many members:

class Example {
    AnotherClass member1;
    AnotherClass member2;
    YetAnotherClass member3;
    ...
};

Is there a short/concise way to do something like:

foreach(member m: myExample)
    m.sharedMethod();

Instead of accessing each one individually?

I think I could put them in a vector and use a shared_ptr for the same effect, I was just wondering if say, Boost or some other popular library doesn’t have something to do this automatically.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T23:14:41+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 11:14 pm

    C++ does not support class introspection, so you cannot iterate over all of the members in a class like that – not without having a (manually written) function that iterates over all members for you anyway.

    You could, in principle, add a template member like so:

    template<typename Functor>
    void doAllMembers(Functor &f) {
      f(member1);
      f(member2);
      f(member3);
    }
    

    That said, I would regard this as a broken design; you’ve gone and exposed all of your internal members publicly. What happens if you add one later? Or change the semantics of one? Make one a cached value that’s sometimes out of date? etc. Moreover, what happens if you have members which don’t all inherit from the same types?

    Step back and reconsider your design.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose I have a class module clsMyClass with an object as a member variable.
Suppose you have an object which can be accesed by many threads. A critical
Suppose a Person object may have many Addresses but must have one Do you
Suppose I have a python object x and a string s , how do
Suppose I have a design like this: Object GUI has two objects: object aManager
Suppose I have a method that takes an object of some kind as an
Suppose I have this code: var myArray = new Object(); myArray["firstname"] = "Bob"; myArray["lastname"]
Suppose I have an array of a objects of user defined class. Wanted to
Suppose you have a collection of a few hundred in-memory objects and you need
I have a Serializable object which is supposed to hold a java.awt.Image as its

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.