Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 698401
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T03:16:16+00:00 2026-05-14T03:16:16+00:00

Suppose I have two functions which look like this: public static void myFunction1(int a,

  • 0

Suppose I have two functions which look like this:

public static void myFunction1(int a, int b, int c, string d)
{
    //dostuff
    someoneelsesfunction(c,d);
    //dostuff2
}

public static void myFunction2(int a, int b, int c, Stream d)
{
    //dostuff
    someoneelsesfunction(c,d);
    //dostuff2
}

What would be a good way to avoid repeated dostuff?

Ideas I’ve thought of, but don’t like:

  1. I could make d an object and cast at runtype based on type, but this strikes me as not being ideal; it removes a type check which was previously happening at compile time.
  2. I could also write a private helper class that takes an object and write both signatures as public functions.
  3. I could replace dostuff and dostuff2 with delegates or function calls or something.
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T03:16:16+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 3:16 am

    I might do something like this:

    public static void myFunction1(int a, int b, int c, string d)
    {
        //dostuff
        someoneelsesfunction(c, d);
        //dostuff2
    }
    
    public static void myFunction2(int a, int b, int c, Stream d)
    {
        string str = d.ReadEntireString(); // no such method, but basically
            // whatever you need to do to read the string out of the stream
        myFunction1(a, b, c, str);      
    }
    

    … and change the name of both functions to MyFunction (to take advantage of overloading, which is the same thing someoneelsesfunction() is doing.

    NOTE: this solution would be impractical if the string contained in the Stream is ginormous. If so, you might want to do this the other way around: read the string d into a stream and call the override with the stream parameter.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 368k
  • Answers 368k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The Entity Framework designer is terrible - I've had the… May 14, 2026 at 5:11 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If by "hijack" you meant sniff the packets then what… May 14, 2026 at 5:11 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you want two actions to be atomic, embed them… May 14, 2026 at 5:11 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.