Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8711269
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T04:50:09+00:00 2026-06-13T04:50:09+00:00

Suppose I want to change the value of a variable when a flag is

  • 0

Suppose I want to change the value of a variable when a flag is set. An obvious method is the following.

int a = 1, b = 2;
if(Flag)
    {
    a=b;
    Flag = false;
    }

This, however, is quite inefficient WRT the code generated to perform the operation. I have found that the following generates 40% less code to perform the operation.

a = ((!Flag)*a)+((Flag)*b);
Flag = false;

My question: I would rather not use the multiply “*” operator as multiplicative/division operators are slower to execute on my target. What else could I use to speed this up without increasing code space?

EDIT: The target device is an MSP430 running in the kHz range. code space and execution time are critical. the compiler is IAR C

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T04:50:10+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 4:50 am

    The following achieves your desired logic without using multiply or any conditionals:

    unsigned int mask = Flag-1;
    a = (mask & a) | (~mask & b);
    

    So when Flag==1 you get

    a = (0x0 & a) | (0xffff & b);
    

    and when Flag==0 you get

    a = (0xffff & a) | (0x0 & b);
    

    (You don’t really need a separate variable for mask either.. you can just do --Flag and use Flag instead of mask, I just thought it’d make the solution a little clearer.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose I want to change the orange node in the following tree. So, the
Suppose I want to put objects that identify a server into a stl set
Suppose I want to execute code, for example value += 5 inside a namespace
I have a variable that is not supposed to change its value after it's
I'm new to PHP so this question seems stupid, but suppose I'm assigning variable
Suppose I have this XML document... <root> <str name=My node's attribute>My string's value</str> </root>
I have following code int i; //gobal var Thread1: { ... i=some value; }
Trying to set a custom property(value) for a ViewController( e.g.- FirstViewController). FirstViewController.h //.. int
Suppose we have a NAME table like this: PERSON_ID PART_TYPE VALUE and PERSON_ID is
Suppose I want to add two buffers and store the result. Both buffers are

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.