Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7522299
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T02:28:59+00:00 2026-05-30T02:28:59+00:00

template <typename T_> class my_class { public: typedef T_ value_type; typedef T_ * pointer;

  • 0
template <typename T_>
class my_class {
public:
       typedef T_   value_type;
       typedef T_ * pointer;

I’m developing a templated class, however because the C++ error detection and intellisence suck for templated stuff, is there a way I can set the template to example int to get the benefit of intellisence, and then when I’m done development just switch it back and fix a couple errors?

I still want my code to be generic and re-writing it as Template Specialization is too much work.

I want to be able to do something like

template <typename T_ = int>
class my_class {
public:
       typedef T_   value_type;
       typedef T_ * pointer;
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T02:29:01+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 2:29 am

    I’m not completely sure I understand what you’re trying to accomplish, but you could typedef T_ to int in the class and disable the template statement, either through the pre-processor or commenting it out.

    #ifndef NO_MY_CLASS_TEMPLATE
    template <typename T_ = int>
    #endif
    class my_class {
    #ifdef NO_MY_CLASS_TEMPLATE
           typedef int T_;
    #endif
    public:
           typedef T_   value_type;
           typedef T_ * pointer;
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The offending code: template<typename T> class SharedObject { public: typedef boost::intrusive_ptr<T> Pointer; typedef boost::intrusive_ptr<T
Given the following piece of code: template<typename T> class MyContainer { typedef T value_type;
Consider the following: template <typename T> class testString { public: typedef T* iterator; void
This is my template matrix class: template<typename T> class Matrix { public: .... Matrix<T>
I have a class template <typename Iterator, typename Value> class Foo { public: Foo(const
template<typename T> class vec3 { public: typename T type_t; T x; T y; T
Because I've overloaded the operator++ for an iterator class template<typename T> typename list<T>::iterator& list<T>::iterator::operator++()
When having: template <typename Super> class Whatever : public Super { ... }; is
Consider a template class like: template<typename ReturnType, ReturnType Fn()> class Proxy { void run()
Given a class with a member template function like this one: template <typename t>

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.