Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 35047
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T14:10:26+00:00 2026-05-10T14:10:26+00:00

Test the following code: #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> main() { const char *yytext=0; const

  • 0

Test the following code:

#include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> main() {     const char *yytext='0';     const float f=(float)atof(yytext);     size_t t = *((size_t*)&f);     printf('t should be 0 but is %d\n', t); } 

Compile it with:

gcc -O3 test.c 

The GOOD output should be:

't should be 0 but is 0' 

But with my gcc 4.1.3, I have:

't should be 0 but is -1209357172' 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T14:10:27+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 2:10 pm

    Use the compiler flag -fno-strict-aliasing.

    With strict aliasing enabled, as it is by default for at least -O3, in the line:

    size_t t = *((size_t*)&f); 

    the compiler assumes that the size_t* does NOT point to the same memory area as the float*. As far as I know, this is standards-compliant behaviour (adherence with strict aliasing rules in the ANSI standard start around gcc-4, as Thomas Kammeyer pointed out).

    If I recall correctly, you can use an intermediate cast to char* to get around this. (compiler assumes char* can alias anything)

    In other words, try this (can’t test it myself right now but I think it will work):

    size_t t = *((size_t*)(char*)&f); 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 120k
  • Answers 120k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The best solution I found was to change it so… May 12, 2026 at 12:04 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The standard answer is to take two iterators at the… May 12, 2026 at 12:04 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer To enforce the order in which conditions are evaluated, use… May 12, 2026 at 12:04 am

Related Questions

I have been advised to use the following options with GCC, as it helps
I have a PS3 that I've installed YDL 6.1 and SDK 3.1 on and
Why does the following code print ‘read(): Resource temporarily unavailable’ 80% of the time?
I'm a C newbie and I was just trying to write a console application

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.