Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6342029
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T20:09:32+00:00 2026-05-24T20:09:32+00:00

The code below is adapted from this answer function MessageClass() { var self =

  • 0

The code below is adapted from this answer

    function MessageClass() {
        var self = this;
        this.clickHander = function(e) { self.someoneClickedMe = true; };

        var _private = 0;
        this.getPrivate = function() { return _private; };
        this.setPrivate = function(val) { _private = val; };
    }

    ErrorMessageClass.prototype = new MessageClass();
    function ErrorMessageClass() {
        MessageClass.apply(this, arguments);
    }

    var errorA = new ErrorMessageClass();
    var errorB = new ErrorMessageClass();
    errorA.setPrivate('A');
    errorB.setPrivate('B');
    console.log(errorA.getPrivate()); 
    console.log(errorB.getPrivate());

The original post did not have the MessageClass.apply(this, arguments); since the purpose was to show how inheritance can go wrong in Javascript.

My question is, is saying: ErrorMessageClass.prototype = new MessageClass(); before the ErrorMessageClass constructor has even been declared bad practice? My understanding is that calling undeclared identifiers like that causes a silent declaration to occur, with the result being placed on the global window object, which I understand is bad.

Is this form:

    function ErrorMessageClass() {
        MessageClass.apply(this, arguments);
    }
    ErrorMessageClass.prototype = new MessageClass();

considered to be better practice? This link shows the code written as it was originally above, which is why I even tried it. Does this blogger know something I don’t (quite likely)?

EDIT

Lots of great info in the answers below, but I did want to highlight this link which really explains things perfectly

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T20:09:33+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 8:09 pm

    It works because function declarations are evaluated first. If you tried to move these classes under an object literal “namespace” the first version would fail.

    I personally find the second method to be much easier to read – also, don’t forget to set the sub-class’ prototype.constructor property back to itself. Personally, I use an inherits() method on the Function prototype which wraps up essentially the type of code you’re using here.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Take the code below, adapted from this question : //Borrowed from another question because
The code below gives me this mysterious error, and i cannot fathom it. I
Code below does not run correctly and throws InvalidOperationExcepiton . public void Foo() {
Code below is not working as expected to detect if it is in design
Code below is working well as long as I have class ClassSameAssembly in same
The code below shows a sample that I've used recently to explain the different
The code below works. But if I comment out the line Dim objRequest As
The code below gives an error: Property 'Int32 Key' is not defined for type
The code below is the code i am using. It works fine in thunderbird
The code below continues many lines until it ends with a expected /veotherwise /vechoose.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.