Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 967473
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T02:19:22+00:00 2026-05-16T02:19:22+00:00

The compiler defined constructor is empty and does not initialize the member variables. Then

  • 0

The compiler defined constructor is empty and does not initialize the member variables. Then why does the compiler create one?

Also what is the difference if any between a compiler defined constructor and an user defined empty constructor?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T02:19:23+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 2:19 am

    The presence or absence of a constructor affects how users of the class can instantiate the object. If the compiler didn’t create a default constructor, then you wouldn’t be able to use a class or struct unless you created your own constructor.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

When i invoke a virtual function from a base constructor, the compiler does not
In Scala, how does one define a local parameter in the primary constructor of
I want to keep the class simple and not defined a constructor so i
If copy constructor is made private then in Case 1: No error, the compiler
In gcc I can do compile-time warnings like this: #if !defined(_SOME_FEATURE_) #warning _SOME_FEATURE_ not
My compiler expands it to 199711L. What does that mean? I read that __cplusplus
I know that C++ compiler creates a copy constructor for a class. In which
My fsyacc code is giving a compiler error saying a variable is not found,
I'm trying to create a child class of TForm with a special constructor for
Let's say we have class X with defined constructor X(int value) . Is this

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.