Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1093253
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T23:48:03+00:00 2026-05-16T23:48:03+00:00

The following code compiles and runs fine. void myInvokedMethod(string s) { Console.WriteLine(s); } void

  • 0

The following code compiles and runs fine.

void myInvokedMethod(string s)
{
    Console.WriteLine(s);
}

void myInvoker()
{
    Invoke(new MethodInvoker(delegate() { myInvokedMethod("one"); }));
    Invoke(new MethodInvoker(delegate   { myInvokedMethod("two"); }));
}

When I call myInvoker, both calls to myInvokedMethod get through. What do the parentheses after delegate mean, and why do they appear to be optional?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T23:48:04+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 11:48 pm

    The parentheses is called the anonymous method parameter list, and is empty in this case. The anonymous method doesn’t have a type – the compiler tries to perform an implicit conversion. If the signature of the anonymous method is given it must match the signature of the delegate.

    Implicit conversion is also possible if the following all hold:

    • The formal parameter list of the delegate is omitted
    • The delegate has no out parameters
    • The return types match

    This is the case in your second example. So there is no difference between those two lines – both do the same thing. Here is another example:

    var x1 = new ParameterizedThreadStart(delegate(object o) {}); // Compiles.
    var x2 = new ParameterizedThreadStart(delegate {});           // Compiles.
    var x3 = new ParameterizedThreadStart(delegate() {});         // Does not compile.
    

    The last two examples show that delegate(){} and delegate{} are not equivalent in general. They are only equivalent in your case because MethodInvoker takes no parameters. See the C# specification section 21 for more details and more examples.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In Microsoft Oslo SDK CTP 2008 (using Intellipad) the following code compiles fine: module
The following code does not compile: public class GenericsTest { public static void main(String[]
The following Code does not compile Dim BasicGroups As String() = New String() {Node1,
The following code compiles correctly under VC++ 8 on XPSP3, but running it causes
Suppose someone (other than me) writes the following code and compiles it into an
In C++ the following code gives a compiler error: void destruct1 (int * item)
The following code compiled with MSVC9.0 runs and outputs Destructor four times, which is
The following code doesn't compile with gcc, but does with Visual Studio: template <typename
The following code fails to compile stating A local variable named 'st' cannot be
This following code gets this compile error: " invalid types 'int[int]' for array subscript

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.