Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1093253
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T23:48:03+00:00 2026-05-16T23:48:03+00:00

The following code compiles and runs fine. void myInvokedMethod(string s) { Console.WriteLine(s); } void

  • 0

The following code compiles and runs fine.

void myInvokedMethod(string s)
{
    Console.WriteLine(s);
}

void myInvoker()
{
    Invoke(new MethodInvoker(delegate() { myInvokedMethod("one"); }));
    Invoke(new MethodInvoker(delegate   { myInvokedMethod("two"); }));
}

When I call myInvoker, both calls to myInvokedMethod get through. What do the parentheses after delegate mean, and why do they appear to be optional?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T23:48:04+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 11:48 pm

    The parentheses is called the anonymous method parameter list, and is empty in this case. The anonymous method doesn’t have a type – the compiler tries to perform an implicit conversion. If the signature of the anonymous method is given it must match the signature of the delegate.

    Implicit conversion is also possible if the following all hold:

    • The formal parameter list of the delegate is omitted
    • The delegate has no out parameters
    • The return types match

    This is the case in your second example. So there is no difference between those two lines – both do the same thing. Here is another example:

    var x1 = new ParameterizedThreadStart(delegate(object o) {}); // Compiles.
    var x2 = new ParameterizedThreadStart(delegate {});           // Compiles.
    var x3 = new ParameterizedThreadStart(delegate() {});         // Does not compile.
    

    The last two examples show that delegate(){} and delegate{} are not equivalent in general. They are only equivalent in your case because MethodInvoker takes no parameters. See the C# specification section 21 for more details and more examples.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following code which compiles and runs fine under Visual Studio 2008
The following code compiles and runs fine with gcc. But i wondered if such
I came across the following code that compiles fine (using Visual Studio 2005): SomeObject
The following code is crashing my application on startup. It compiles just fine but
Please consider the following code: vector<int> myVector; myVector.push_back(10); myVector.erase(myVector.end()); This code compiles and runs
If I have a function void Foo(params int[] bar){} The following runs fine: int[]
The following code compiles in Visual C++ and gcc, but fails with Code Warrior
the following code compiles with Visual Studio 2008 but not with g++ on Mac
The following source code compiles correctly with Visual Studio 2010: namespace NS { class
I have the following code that compiles and works well: template<typename T> T GetGlobal(const

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.