Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 633595
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T20:12:13+00:00 2026-05-13T20:12:13+00:00

The question doesn’t really concerne DDD but would like to know if there is

  • 0

The question doesn’t really concerne DDD but would like to know if there is any way to model a loosely coupled domain model. What I mean by that ? I work for a software HR editor and we’re planning to start a new application from scratch. We did an audit of all projects we did for our 150 customers and the fact is that we can’t say there is one valid domain model from the point of view of DDD.

Why ? Because each company deals with HR in different ways depending on how big the company is, etc. etc.

Of course we can identify commun entities in HR domain like: job, offer, collaborator, skills, etc, but they are not linked the same way for the client A and the client B.
So from the point of view of Domain Model we can’t say that Entity A has a reference to Entity B which have a collection of skills because it won’t be true for another customer.

Even if for 80% of our customer we can design a model that adresses 90% of needs we won’t sacrify the rest of the customers and on the other hand would like to have a product witouht doing specific development to address differents concerns.

We looked at BPM solutions but that doesn’t fit well with our needs. On the other hand I can’t imagine how you can handle what we need. In fact the links between entities should be “done” at runtime from a sort of parameter, xml, etc. for each client. We would like to not have to code another application because the domain model has slightly changed. This could be completely insane to not have a propper Domain Model but something based on messaging could help us.

Would like your thoughs about that. How did you deal with such a situations.

Thanks,

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T20:12:14+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 8:12 pm

    The purpose of a Domain Model is to encapsulate common behaviors and relationships. While you can (and should) loosely couple your implementation, there are limits to how configuration-driven you can make it.

    If you keep pushing it towards more and more configurability, at a certain point it will stop being a Domain Model and instead become a Framework. You can then use the Framework to define specific Domain Models.

    Writing a Framework is really, really hard, so I don’t think it would be a feasible plan to start a project with that explicit goal.

    If you can, start with a common code base and every time you get a customer-specific request, refactor the kernel so that you can implement the customer feature as a plugin.

    With lots of time, luck and skill, you may be able to evolve that kernel into a Domain-Specific Framework.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know that question doesn't make much sense, but here goes: Times Table Authority
This question doesn't relate only to MouseEvent.CLICK event type but to all event types
Yes, there is a similar question here . However, that question doesn't seem to
Following my question regarding a .NET YAML Library ... as there doesn't seem to
EDIT : This question doesn't really make sense once you have picked up what
I am sure the title of my question doesn't make much sense. But here
I have a question that doesn't need any specific answer, just a general direction
Hey guys, i know the question doesn't make it clear enough (couldn't find how
my apologies if this question doesn't make much sense, but I'm new(ish) to Actionscript,
A review of SO doesn't categorically answer this question. It could be implied, but

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.