Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 582781
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T14:43:25+00:00 2026-05-13T14:43:25+00:00

The realloc reference says: The function may move the memory block to a new

  • 0

The realloc reference says:

The function may move the memory block
to a new location, in which case the
new location is returned.

Does it mean that if I do this:

void foo() {

        void* ptr = malloc( 1024 );

        unsigned char* cptr = ( unsigned char* )ptr+256;

        ptr = realloc( ptr, 4096 );
}

then cptr may become invalid if realloc moves the block?

If yes, then does realloc signal in any way, that it will move the block, so that I can do something to prevent cptr from becoming invalid?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T14:43:25+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 2:43 pm

    Yes, cptr will become invalid as realloc moves the block! And no, there is no mention of signalling to you to tell that it is moving the block of memory. By the way, your code looks iffy…read on… please see my answer to another question and read the code very carefully on how it uses realloc. The general consensus is if you do this:

    void *ptr = malloc(1024);
    
    /* later on in the code */
    
    ptr = realloc(ptr, 4096);
    
    /* BAM! if realloc failed, your precious memory is stuffed! */
    
    

    The way to get around that is to use a temporary pointer and use that as shown:

    void *ptr = malloc(1024);
    
    /* later on in the code */
    
    void *tmp = realloc(ptr, 4096);
    
    if (tmp != null) ptr = tmp;
    
    

    Edit: Thanks Secure for pointing out a gremlin that crept in when I was typing this earlier on.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I've written a c/c++ memory manager for heap allocations (overloaded new/delete and malloc/realloc/free, based
When you try to extend your memory allocation with realloc() , does Linux arrange
What is the best way to zero out new memory after calling realloc while
When I try to use realloc to allocate memory for a pointer which has
In the code sample below does the realloc free the memory I allocated for
Why would one use realloc() function to resize an dynamically allocated array rather than
I'm having a problem with the realloc function. I'm using C only (so no
I am writing a realloc function and currently my realloc handles two cases (not
Confusion 1 : The man realloc says that the object will be moved if
Im trying to increase the size of a **array with realloc which I have

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.