Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4612498
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T01:24:39+00:00 2026-05-22T01:24:39+00:00

The reason I ask is that I’ve written a rendering scheme for a 2d

  • 0

The reason I ask is that I’ve written a rendering scheme for a 2d top down game that uses ortho projection. To give the appearance of depth I scale the objects. I’m wondering if switching to frustum and using the z-coor in lieu of scaling will improve performance. I would just implement it and find out, but it would take me several hours, and its easier to just ask here.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T01:24:39+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 1:24 am

    glScale just simply modifies the matrix on top of the stack, all done in CPU. As for expensive “relatively speaking”, I guess I ask – relative to what? 🙂 It’s not that expensive if you are doing it occasionally. If you are doing it in a critical inner loop, then, yeah, it could be expensive.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The reason I ask is that Stack Overflow has been Slashdotted , and Redditted
Does flash.security.allowDomain(*) allow for redirects? The reason why I ask is that I'm trying
The reason I ask is that we'd like to use a certain CHECK constraint
The reason I ask is that I am trying to run MVC side-by-side with
Like the title says. Reason I ask is that we're converting PDFs to formatted
The reason I ask is that you can cast a nullable type to a
It works, no crashes. Is it OK? edit: the reason I ask is that
For one of our applications, I've written a utility that uses java's DOM parser.
...the reason I ask is that Safari has a bug in its implementation of
The reason I ask is that in SA we're bandwidth challenged, and it would

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.