Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 760317
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T15:42:10+00:00 2026-05-14T15:42:10+00:00

The standard way of declaring an enum in C++ seems to be: enum <identifier>

  • 0

The standard way of declaring an enum in C++ seems to be:

enum <identifier> { <list_of_elements> };

However, I have already seen some declarations like:

typedef enum { <list_of_elements> } <identifier>;

What is the difference between them, if it exists? Which one is correct?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T15:42:11+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 3:42 pm

    C compatability.

    In C, union, struct and enum types have to be used with the appropriate keyword before them:

    enum x { ... };
    
    enum x var;
    

    In C++, this is not necessary:

    enum x { ... };
    
    x var;
    

    So in C, lazy programmers often use typedef to avoid repeating themselves:

    typedef enum x { ... } x;
    
    x var;
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there some standard way to name indexes for SQL Server? It seems that
It seems that the standard way to draw dots, lines, circles, and Bezier paths
Is there some standard way or has anyone written something that allows you to
Is there a standard way to implement a button like the one below in
Is there standard way to implement standard Iphone Check List like when you choose
Is there any standard way to access Java Bean Property like class A {
Is there a standard way (i.e. defined by some Java/J2EE/etc. spec) to provide a
Is there a standard way to using Enums in EF code-first? There seems to
The standard way to create an object in Objective-C looks like this: MyClass* object
The standard way of creating URLs in grails is: <a href=${createLink(controller:'news', action: 'show', params:

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.