Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 150035
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T09:13:34+00:00 2026-05-11T09:13:34+00:00

The standard way to capture command output in Bourne shell is to use the

  • 0

The standard way to capture command output in Bourne shell is to use the $() syntax:

output=$(mycommand) 

For commands that have a lot of output, however, this requires the shell allocate memory for the whole thing as one long string. I’d prefer to find something that does the moral equivalent of the Unix C function popen, to get a new file descriptor I could read from:

newfd=popen(mycommand) while read -u $newfd LINE; do   #process output done 

Is this even possible?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T09:13:35+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 9:13 am
    #!bash ls | while read X do      echo  $X is a directory entry done 

    Replace ‘ls’ with the command of your choice

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it possible to capture cout in a way so that every standard output
I'm looking for a way to capture all standard output and standard error to
Is there any standard way of debugging Javascript on a webpage that's being accessed
Is there an already built-in, standard way in JMock to capture method arguments to
I'm looking to execute a shell command in Go and get the resulting output
So I have been doing a lot of reading about the way iOS handles
I am trying to start a process and capture the output, have come a
I would like to capture the output of the time command (which writes to
I want to capture output sent to standard out and standard error within an
The standard way of creating URLs in grails is: <a href=${createLink(controller:'news', action: 'show', params:

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.